"*" indicates required fields Step 1 of 17 5% CME ACTIVITY EVALUATION Compassionate Addiction Medicine, Whole Person Care for Birthing People Friday, August 12 –Sunday, August 14th Seattle Convention Center, Seattle, WA 98101 WAG is interested in your evaluation of the CME activity you have just completed. WAG will use your feedback to assess whether the training has met your needs and expectations, and to determine whether modifications are needed to improve future CME/Educational activities. Please complete this evaluation and return it to the registration desk. We are grateful for you attending our 2nd Women and Addiction Group Summit: Compassionate Addiction Medicine: Whole person care for birthing people. As part of the CME and post- event’s evaluation, you are being asked to participate in a survey to provide us with understanding and guidance as to how we can optimize care for pregnant and parenting people with substance use disorder (SUD). Although you may find some of the questions embarrassing or awkward, your responses will guide us in our efforts to facilitate safe and compassionate care for opioid use in pregnancy providers and patients. No one person’s answers will be shared with others. Only the collective data will be used to inform care practices. If you have any questions or concerns about this survey, please email Vania (Vania.Rudolf@swedish.org) and/or Hendree (Hendree_jones@med.unc.edu) Thank you! Please Complete this Section. All of the Fields are Required Your Name* Your Email* Your Phone*Are You a Physician* Yes No CME Event Name* Date* MM slash DD slash YYYY Location of CME* Number of CME Hours*Please enter a number from 1 to 24.5. 1. Provider attitudes regarding patients with substance use disorder during the perinatal period - Post-Conference Survey Please answer the questions below with regard to your care of patients over all 4 trimesters (perinatal) patients with substance use disorder:I get satisfaction from being able to help perinatal patients with substance use problems. Never Rarely Sometimes Often very Often I feel working with these patients is meaningful. Never Rarely Sometimes Often very Often I like my work with these patients. Never Rarely Sometimes Often very Often I am pleased with how I am able to stay up-to-date on best practices and protocols for treating perinatal patients with substance use problems. Never Rarely Sometimes Often very Often Working with perinatal patients who have substance use problems makes me feel satisfied and rewarded. Never Rarely Sometimes Often very Often I feel positive about treating perinatal patients with substance use problems and how I can help them. Never Rarely Sometimes Often very Often I believe I can make a difference for this population through my work. Never Rarely Sometimes Often very Often I am proud of what I can do to help. Never Rarely Sometimes Often very Often I feel I am a "successful" care giver when treating patients for substance use disorders during the perinatal period. Never Rarely Sometimes Often very Often I feel I have good knowledge about what to do to care for patients who have substance problems in the perinatal period. Never Rarely Sometimes Often very Often I feel competent when caring for patients who are using substances during the perinatal period and referring them to treatment. Never Rarely Sometimes Often very Often How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?I am more comfortable helping a patient during the perinatal period without substance use than one with substance use. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Disagree or Agree Agree Strongly Agree If a pregnant patient with a substance problem complains of physical symptoms (e.g., nausea, back pain or headache), I would likely attribute this to her substance use. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Disagree or Agree Agree Strongly Agree If I were under treatment for a substance use problem I would disclose this to my colleagues. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Disagree or Agree Agree Strongly Agree I would be more inclined to seek help for substance use if my treating healthcare provider was not associated with my workplace. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Disagree or Agree Agree Strongly Agree I would see myself as weak if I had a substance use problem and could not fix it myself. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Disagree or Agree Agree Strongly Agree I would seek help if I had a substance use problem. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Disagree or Agree Agree Strongly Agree I would still go to a physician if I knew that the physician had been treated for a substance use problem in the past. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Disagree or Agree Agree Strongly Agree It is the responsibility of health care providers to inspire hope for recovery in patients with substance use problems. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Disagree or Agree Agree Strongly Agree I have negative feelings and/or reactions towards people who have substance use problems. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Disagree or Agree Agree Strongly Agree There is little I can do to help people with substance use problems during the perinatal period. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Disagree or Agree Agree Strongly Agree Most pregnant/parenting people with substance use problems try hard to get better. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Disagree or Agree Agree Strongly Agree Pregnant/parenting people with substance use problems pose a risk to their children. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Disagree or Agree Agree Strongly Agree Medication (e.g., methadone or buprenorphine) is an effective treatment for opioid use disorder during the perinatal period. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Disagree or Agree Agree Strongly Agree A person with an active substance use disorder should have their child removed from their care. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Disagree or Agree Agree Strongly Agree Healthcare providers must be advocates for pregnant/parenting patients with substance use problems Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Disagree or Agree Agree Strongly Agree I struggle to feel compassion for a pregnant/parenting person with a history of a substance use problem Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Disagree or Agree Agree Strongly Agree Personal Information SectionYour Race. American Indian or Alaska Native Black or African American White Asian Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander More than one race Prefer not to answer Your Ethnicity Hispanic or Latine/Latinx Non Hispanic or Latine/Latinx Prefer not to answer Your Gender Male Female Non-binary Agender My gender isn't listed Prefer Not to Answer Your Age Under 18 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65 or Above Prefer Not to Answer Your Country USA Prefer not to answer Other Professional Information SectionProfession/Degree (check all that apply) MD DO CNM ARNP RN DNP MSW Licensed counselor, psychologist, therapist Peer support or recovery coach Prefer not to answer Other Other Professional Degrees ( Up to 5 Add RemoveWhich title best describes your professional role: Physician/Primary Care Physician/Psychiatry Physician/Addiction Medicine Nurse Advanced Practice Nurse Clinical Supervisor Clinical Administrator/Manager Psychologist Counselor Physician Assistant Social Worker Federal Gov’t Employee State Gov’t Employee City Gov’t Employee Other Years in practice: < 5 years 5-10 years 10-20 years > 20 years PART I—OVERALL PROGRAM EVALUATION The following statements refer to the CME activity as a whole. Please read each statement and fill in the number that corresponds to the ONE response that best expresses your opinion.Please use the scale to indicate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements.1. The meeting set-up and logistics for this CME activity were well organized. Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree 2. The material presented and skills learned during this CME activity will be useful in caring for my patients. Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree 3. I expect to use the resources given during the CME activity. Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree 4. My questions and issues were addressed during the CME activity. Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree 5. The delivery formats (eg, lecture, panel, etc.) used during the activity were appropriately aligned with the content. Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree 6. I am satisfied with the overall CME Activity Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree If you disagree with any of the statements above, please comment here: PART II: COMMERCIAL INTEREST1. Was this activity free of commercial interest? Yes No (If no, please describe) PART III: GENERAL FEEDBACK1. What components of the program were especially valued and should be prioritized to continue in future programs2. What components of the program were especially valued and should be prioritized to continue in future programs3. What specific topics would you like to have included in future programs? Pain Management Opiates/Opioids Buprenorphine Naltrexone Neurobiology/Neuropharmacology Sedatives Hallucinogens/Dissociatives/Inhalants/Steroids Detoxification Practice Management/Administrative Issues Psychiatric Co-Morbidities Tobacco/Nicotine Dependence Neonatal/pediatric care Family treatment Modalities of treatment (e.g., residential and outpatient) Counseling/Therapy Techniques Adolescent/Teen Issues Alcohol Stimulants Genetics/Biomarkers Cannabis/Synthetic Cannabinoids Medical Co-morbidities Pharmacology and Toxicology Women’s Issues Methadone Legislative/Policy Dyadic care Self care and preventing burnout Other If There Other Topics You Would Like Included - Enter Them Here ( Up to 5 ). Add Remove4. What areas do you need additional skills/competence? Practice Management/Administrative Issues Pain Management Detoxification Therapy/Counseling Techniques Best Practices Updates in Treatments Behavioral Addictions Career Development Legislative and Policy Psychiatric Issues/Comorbidities Socioeconomic Challenges of Patients Other Additional Skills/Competencies - List up to 5 Add Remove5. Additional Comments; please provide personal feedback: PART IV: EVALUATION OF PLENARIES AND WORKSHOPSDAY 1 PLENARIES Plenary #1 Compassionate addiction medicine via the lens of people with living experience (8:00 - 8:30 a.m.) Masitsa Muhanji Jenny Lau Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Please fill in only ONE rating for each category. Not at All Not Well Achived Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations. 1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2. Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Plenary #2 Whole person and stigma free caring for birthing people across the lifespan (8:30 - 8:45 a.m.) Hendree Jones Bias, respectful communications and person-first language (8:45 - 9:00 a.m.) Vania Rudolf Masitsa Muhanji Jenny Lau Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not at All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations. 1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2. Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated.[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Plenary #3 Bioethics, trust and mistrust (9:00 - 9:15 a.m.) Mishka Terplan Obstetrical anti-racism and gender equity (9:15 - 9:30 a.m.) Leah Habersham Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not at All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2. Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Plenary #4 SAMHSA and national perspective about caring for pregnant people with SUD (9:30 - 9:45 a.m.) Jean Bennett Wisdom to be an empowering female leader (9:45 - 10:00 a.m.) Loretta Finnegan Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations. 1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2. Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Plenary #5 Evidence-based wisdom in clinical practice (10:30 - 10:45 a.m.) Essence Hairston Compassionate and person-centered communication (10:45 - 11:00 a.m.) Caitlin Martin Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2. Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters:[optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated: Plenary #6 Opioid use disorder in the inpatient and outpatient settings (11:00 - 11:15 a.m.) Abi Plawman Opioid use disorder and perinatal pharmacokinetics: methadone (11:15 - 11:30 a.m.) Jack McCarthy Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2. Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Plenary #7 Opioid use disorder and perinatal pharmacokinetics: buprenorphine (11:30 - 11:45 a.m.) Tricia Wright Opioid use disorder, harm reduction and overdose prevention (11:45 - 12:00 p.m.) Liz Wolkin Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2. Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: DAY 1 LUNCH TALKS Educational Networking Lunch Presentation #1 Fentanyl and overdose prevention (12:30 - 12:50 p.m.) Brad Finegood Presentation #2 Changing legal status and response to drugs; the need for new, more accessible, kind, person- centered, community- based models of care (12:50 - 1:10 p.m.) Caleb Banta-Green Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Please fill in only ONE rating for each category. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations. 1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2. Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters DAY 1 AFTERNOON WORKSHOPS Workshop #1, Room 611- 612 Initiation of MOUD and acute/chronic pain management in the setting of OUD/SUD (1:30 - 2:50 p.m.) Marjorie Meyer Vania Rudolf Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not at All Not Well Achieved Third Choice Satisfactorily Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2. Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Workshop #2, Room 609 WA perinatal collaborative, creating a partnership among birthing hospitals (1:30 - 2:50 p.m.) Mary Kay Ausenhus Tiffani Buck Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2. Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Workshop #3, Room 608 Family and harm reduction doula support for the unhoused and pregnant people with SUD (1:30 - 2:50 p.m.) Ashley Woods Chelsie Porter Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2. Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Workshop #4, Room 611- 612 Complexities of reproductive capacity and SUD (3:20 - 4:40 p.m.) Jessica Gray HCA and Medicaid initiatives to improve maternal wellness and mortality Charissa Fotinos Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2. Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Workshop #5, Room 609 Mom-baby-family unit — multidisciplinary and whole person caring on the postpartum unit through the lens of nursing, nutrition/ occupational therapy and social work (3:20 - 4:40 p.m.) Carol Wissner Lil Springer Shana Nielsen Lisa Christoferson Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2. Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Workshop #6, Room 608 Compassionate support, harm reduction, overdose prevention and navigation in the emergency department/hospital system (3:20 - 4:40 p.m.) Liz Wolkin Tipu Khan Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2. Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: DAY 2 PLENARIES Plenary #1 Compassionate addiction medicine, culturally and race equitable via the lens of people with living experience (8:00 - 8:30 a.m.)) Masitsa Muhanji Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2. Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Plenary #2 Whole person and family support for birthing people, infants and families, Eat Sleep Console (ESC) (8:30 - 8:45 a.m.) Elisha Wachman COMPASSION model (8:45 - 9:00 a.m.) Vania Rudolf Masitsa Muhanji Jenny Lau Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2. Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Plenary #3 Child welfare (9:00 - 9:15 a.m.) Mishka Terplan Yuan He Plan of safety care and patient-responsive DCYF support (9:15 - 9:30 a.m.) Alissa Copeland Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2. Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Plenary #4 Equitable care for birthing and indigenous people: culturally and linguistically compassionate approaches (9:30 - 9:45 a.m.) Maria Manriquez Patient-centered equitable care across the world (9:45 - 10:00 a.m.) Hendree Jones Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2. Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Plenary #5 Transgender/LGTBQIA/ intersex/non-binary people (10:30 - 10:45 a.m.) Carrie Griffin Clinical tips for communication, trauma- responsive and gender equitable care (10:45 - 11:00 a.m.) Carrie Griffin Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2. Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Plenary #6 Compassionate care for birthing people with SUD involved in the legal system (11:00 - 11:15 a.m.) Dominika (Nika) Seidman Advocacy, tips and best practices for birthing people in the jail/DOC system (11:15 - 11:30 a.m.) Andrea Knittel Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2. Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Plenary #7 Reproductive psychiatry, mental health and co- occurring disorders (11:30 - 11:45 a.m.) Cathy Friedman Mental health, psychiatric medications (11:45 - 12:00 p.m.) Jen Wells Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2. Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters:Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2. Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: DAY 2 WORKSHOPS Workshop #1, Room 611- 612 Post Roe: Now what and what’s next (1:30 - 2:50 p.m.) Mishka Terplan Marcela Smid Jennifer Chin Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2. Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Workshop #2, Room 609 Tobacco, vaping, and cannabis use disorders (1:30 - 2:50 p.m.)) Charissa Patricelli Krisanna Deppen CARA, outpatient hub and spokes outcomes (1:30 - 2:50 p.m.) Casey Tak Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2.Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Workshop #3, Room 608 The opioid epidemic: fentanyl and kratom, optimal approaches for initiation and stabilization with MOUD (buprenorphine and methadone) (1:30 - 2:50 p.m.)) Vania Rudolf Lisa Voltarelli Jessica Gray Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2.Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Workshop #4, Room 608 Neonatal opioid withdrawal (3:20 - 4:40 p.m.) Elisha Wachman Toxicology testing in birth centers Dominika (Nika) Seidman Newborn health and mom-baby-family unit approaches Vania Rudolf Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2.Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Workshop #5. Room 608 Emerging role of psychedelic therapies for trauma, addiction, and depression with postpartum/ intergenerational focus (3:20 - 4:40 p.m.) Kaylin Klie Larry Leeman Psychosocial treatment, contingency management and relapse prevention Sara Witcraft Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2.Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Workshop #6, Room 608 Midwives as partners in perinatal substance use identification and treatment. (3:20 - 4:40 p.m.) Meagan Thompson Lauren Taylor Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2.Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: DAY 3 PLENARIES Plenary #1 Compassionate addiction medicine, non-judgmental communication, and peer support via the lens of people with living experience (8:00 - 8:30 a.m.) Jenny Lau Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2.Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Plenary #2 Stimulant use disorder (8:30 - 8:45 a.m.) Tricia Wright Co-occurring stimulant use and fentanyl (8:45 - 9:00 a.m.) Marcela Smid Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2.Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Plenary #3 Alcohol use disorder and FASD (9:00 - 9:15 a.m.) Katherine DeJong Benzodiazepine use disorder (9:15 - 9:30 a.m.) Vania Rudolf Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2.Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Plenary #4 Treatment approaches to heal addiction in birthing people (9:30 - 9:45 a.m) Karol Kaltenbach March of Dimes, COMPASSION supportive group model (9:45 - 10:00 a.m.) Amy Johnson-Rubio Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2.Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Plenary #5 Hallucinogens, PCP and LSD (9:30 - 9:45 a.m) Kaylin Klie Inhalants (10:45 - 11:00 a.m.) Chuck Schauberger Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2.Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Plenary #6 No one cares alone (11:00 - 11:15 a.m.) Ryan Dix Clinician well-being and self-compassion (11:15 - 11:30 a.m.) Josh Cutler Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2.Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Plenary #7 Compassionate care for birthing people with SUD through the lens of HCA (11:30 - 11:45 a.m.) Charissa Fotinos Compassionate care and vision for birthing people with SUD through the lens of legislature (11:45 a.m. to noon) Rep. Lauren Davis Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2.Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: DAY 3 LUNCH TALK Educational Networking Lunch Presentation #1 Suicide, overdose and the gray areas in between. (12:30 - 12:50 p.m.) Rick Ries Presentation #2 Clinical experience with extended release injectable buprenorphine (12:50 - 1:10 p.m.) Andy Saxon Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2.Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent [optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters: Afternoon Session (1:30 – 5:30 p.m.) Training Course Workshop/ASAM course for all attendees, Room 611-612 Moving beyond the barriers of treating opioid use disorder, DEI and bias training (1:30 - 4:30 p.m.) Vania Rudolf Hendree Jones Tricia Wright Mishka Terplan /p> <p>Moving beyond the barriers</p>Please indicate the extent to which the learning objectives as stated by the presenters at the beginning of their presentations have been achieved. Not At All Not Well Achieved Satisfactorily Achieved Well Achieved Greatly Evaluate the effectiveness of the activity’s presenters and presentations.1. Expertise of presenters Poor Fair Good Excellent 2.Quality of evidence in presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 3. Organization of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 4. Delivery of presentations Poor Fair Good Excellent 5. Relevance of content to objectives Poor Fair Good Excellent <p>Moving beyond the barriers</p>[optional] Was something exceptionally strong or exceptionally weak about the presentation or presenter(s)? If so, please describe and provide the name(s) as indicated:<p>Moving beyond the barriers</p>[optional] Additional Comments about the Presentation and/or Presenters:Thank you for completing the Survey. If you have any comments, concerns or require corrections, kindly email Vania (Vania.Rudolf@swedish.org) and/or Hendree (Hendree_jones@med.unc.edu) . CommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
